What does Qassim Suleimani’s death mean for the market?

What investors need to know about geopolitical events and market volatility

On Thursday evening, Iran’s top security and intelligence commander, General Qassim Suleimani, was killed in a drone strike at Baghdad International Airport. The strike, which was authorized by US President Donald Trump, represents a potentially dangerous escalation in the growing confrontation between the US and Iran.

How are the markets responding?

Markets reacted quickly to Suleimani’s death. In the hours following the strike, the S&P 500 Index fell roughly 1%, while US Treasury rates are trending lower.1 Meanwhile, safe-haven currencies such as the Japanese yen and assets such as gold are rallying, and oil prices climbed by more than 4%.1

How should investors view the ongoing events?

Short-term market volatility is almost entirely driven by policy uncertainty and/or geopolitical uncertainty. This time will likely be no different. We expect that uncertainty may persist in the near term as markets await potential retaliation from Iran and disruption in the global oil markets.

However, as the charts represent, market returns have tended to be, on average, positive in the 12 months following spikes in the Geopolitical Risk Index.   

Source: Bloomberg, L.P. and EconomicPolicyUncertainty.com as of Jan. 3, 2019. Chart reflects total returns including dividends reinvested for the 12-month period. Cuban Missile Crisis: June 30, 1967 – June 30, 1968. Yom Kippur War: Oct. 31, 1973 – Oct. 31, 1974. USSR/Afghanistan: Jan 31, 1980 – Jan. 31, 1981. Falkland Islands: Apr. 30, 1982 – Apr. 30, 1983. Beirut: Nov. 30, 1983 – Nov. 30, 1984. Chernobyl: June 30, 1986 – June 30, 1987. Iraq/Kuwait: Jan. 31, 1991 – Jan. 31, 1992. Sep. 11: Oct. 30, 2001 – Oct. 30, 2002. US/Iraq: March 31, 2003 – March 31, 2004. Russia/Crimea: Sep. 30, 2014 – Sep. 30, 2015. North Korea: Aug. 31, 2017 – Aug. 31, 2018. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.
Source: Bloomberg, L.P. and EconomicPolicyUncertainty.com as of Jan. 3, 2019. Chart reflects total returns including dividends reinvested for the 12-month period following each peak. Past performance is no guarantee of future results. An investment cannot be made directly into an index.

Do the ongoing events change the larger business and market cycle narrative?

As always, investors should assess geopolitical events as to the extent that they change the overarching market narrative. This is unlikely to be the case, but we do want to follow business sentiment closely given that Iran has promised “harsh retaliation” that some experts believe could come in the form of cyberattacks on US businesses.

It is important to note that the US is energy-independent, and so the ramifications of heightened conflict in the Middle East on the US vis a vis energy is far less than it would be just two decades ago.

Historically, regional geopolitical happenings are not the events that end business and market cycles. As an example, Iran’s bombing of the Saudi oil fields in 2019 led to short-term market volatility, in a year in which markets reached record highs.

The larger market narrative of slow growth, benign inflation globally, generally accommodative monetary policy globally, and equities still attractive relative to bonds, has not changed. In our opinion, the backdrop for equities and other risk assets remains favorable. 

Important information

Blog header image: Rasoul Ali / Getty Images

1 Source: CNN Business, “Oil prices surge 4% after Iran military leader killed in drone strike,” Jan. 3, 2020

Past performance is no guarantee of future results.

All investing involves risk, including risk of loss.

The opinions referenced above are those of the author as of Jan. 3, 2020. These comments should not be construed as recommendations, but as an illustration of broader themes. Forward-looking statements are not guarantees of future results. They involve risks, uncertainties and assumptions; there can be no assurance that actual results will not differ materially from expectations.

Brian Levitt is the Global Market Strategist, focusing on North America, for Invesco. He is responsible for the development and communication of the firm’s investment outlooks and insights.

Mr. Levitt has two decades of investment experience in the asset management industry. In April 2000, he joined OppenheimerFunds, starting in fixed income product management and then transitioning into the macro and investment strategy group in 2005. Mr. Levitt co-hosted the OppenheimerFunds World Financial Podcast, which explored global long-term investing trends. He joined Invesco when the firm combined with Oppenheimer Funds in 2019.

Mr. Levitt earned a BA degree in economics from the University of Michigan and an MBA with honors in finance and international business from Fordham University. He is frequently quoted in the press, including Barron’s, Financial Times and The Wall Street Journal. He appears regularly on CNBC, Bloomberg and PBS’s Nightly Business Report.

More in Market & Economic
Past presidential turmoil didn’t keep stocks down for long

On Dec. 18, 2019, President Donald Trump was impeached by the House of Representatives on two counts, becoming the third US president to be impeached...